Originally published on December 22, 2011


 Most farmland is held outside of the company because individually owned farm­land is eligible for the capital gains exemption.

However, three of my firm’s corpo­rate farmers have moved contrary to the herd in the past month by using their corporations to buy adjoining farmland.

The land was considered to have been acquired at a high cost and the parcels were small — two quarter-sections or less.

Let’s assume that a farmer has the means to buy a quarter section for $180,000. He can either buy it person­ally or within his farming corporation. He pulls a regular salary of $42,000 from his farming corporation, which makes any additional income subject to a 35 percent marginal tax rate.

His Saskatchewan corporation pays 13 percent tax on the first $500,000 of taxable income.

Let’s also assume that this quarter section will double in value in 20 years. At that time, it will be sold.

What’s the upside?

Fewer overall farm dollars are required to pay off the mortgage if the company buys the land.

For simplicity, let’s assume that the farmland is 100 percent financed. That means it would require $207,000 of corporate dollars to repay the mort­gage in full.

However, if the farmer bought the same quarter outside of his company, he would require $277,000 of salaried or rental income to repay the mort­gage in full. If the mortgage was to be repaid in 10 years, this farmer would have to pay $7,000 more per year to pay off the land.

The $70,000 difference is comprised entirely from the difference in corpo­rate versus individual income tax rates. More dollars are available for debt servicing in a corporation than out.

But what are we losing?



There will be a capital gain of $180,000 if the farmland value dou­bles in 20 years to $360,000. Half of this would be taxable using current rates. If the farmer as an individual buys the land he would save $33,986 of personal income taxes by claiming his capital gains exemption.

The company would also report a capital gain of $180,000 if it sold the same land for $360,000.

Our corporate farmer would pay $18,000 in corporate taxes using cur­rent rates, with no refundable tax component.

It should also be noted that the funds would be trapped in the com­pany. More personal income taxes would have to be paid if the net funds were pushed out of the company, which further equalizes our positions.

Farmers also prefer to hold land personally because it allows them to take advantage of farm debt legisla­tion that protects individual land­owners. The same level of protection is not available to the corporate farm­er.

In the end, given the option, all three of our corporate farming clients have decided to use their corporations to buy the farmland. They reasoned that having an extra $7,000 annually in their farming operations was more important than saving tax in 20 years.

Twenty years is a long time in farm­ing and if the price outlook for farm­land remains bullish, it is possible with some accounting magic to get the same tax-free capital gains exemption on corporately owned land. It is a more complicated and costly process and will require the right team of legal and accounting advisers.

If you are considering buying farm­land at prices you never before imag­ined, then be sure to consider the corporate option.

There is a lot of uncertainty in farm­ing, but having more cash right now is not a bad motivation to consider this option.


Allyn Tastad, chartered professional accountant, is a partner in the accounting firm of Hounjet Tastad Harpham in Saskatoon at 306-653-5100, e-mail at or website All data and information provided is for informational purposes only. Readers are cautioned that laws and regulations are subject to change. Consult your accountant for current professional advice tailored to your situation.